Throughpoint is the layer between what your team decides and what your tools believe. It reads your sprint, understands what changed in the meeting — priorities, ownership, dependencies, timelines, execution risk — and proposes the updates needed to keep everything aligned. One Slack card. You approve, it lands. You decline, nothing moves.
Dami said: “Let’s push OAuth onboarding to next sprint, backend isn’t ready.”
cross-meeting note — you committed to shipping OAuth this sprint in Tuesday’s planning, 8 days ago. Confirming will reverse that.
Anatomy ↗ — what changed, who owns it, which dependencies move, sprint-completion math, and the commitment it'd reverse. Posted to Slack 30 seconds after the meeting.
Watch one piece of execution travel through the reconciliation layer end to end — from the moment it’s said to the moment Linear, Slack, and your roadmap stop disagreeing about what was decided.
Dami · planning · sprint 14
“Let’s review OAuth onboarding again on Thursday, when backend is stable.”
Throughpoint is already in the room — listening, but mostly reading. It knows what sprint you’re in, what’s on the board, and what was promised last time.
posted to #eng-sprint-14 · awaits Dami
proposed changes
One sentence in a meeting → synchronized execution across your stack. Multiply that by every decision your team makes in a quarter and you have organizational continuity — the part that used to live only in people’s heads.
Your team probably already has a notetaker. It does one job well: capturing what was said. The thing nobody’s solved is keeping your tools' state in sync with what was actually decided.
“someone has to manually translate decisions into execution state tracking.”
ThroughpointA transcript remembers a meeting. Throughpoint remembers your team. These are the two things it does that a notetaker structurally cannot — and the moment they fire, you stop comparing us to one.
“This reverses a commitment you made 8 days ago.”
Every decision is written to a ledger with its owner, timestamp, and rationale. Weeks later, when a new call contradicts an old one, Throughpoint surfaces it — who agreed, when, and what reversing it costs. A transcript would have forgotten by then.
“The OAuth dependency keeps surfacing in planning.”
Throughpoint clusters what your team actually talks about across meetings. When the same blocker or unresolved topic keeps coming back, it says so — so the thing everyone keeps re-litigating finally gets named instead of quietly draining the sprint.
You probably already use one of these. We’re not trying to replace your notetaker or your Jira agent — we sit in the gap between them.
swipe to compare →
Two lists, written down before the first line of code.
LinearJiraGitHub IssuesNo autonomous action — ever. Throughpoint asks. The others act.
We’re honest about what’s live and what’s coming. The reconciliation core works now. Everything after it deepens the same idea — continuity between conversations and the systems your work actually lives in.
Every meeting becomes an approve-or-dismiss Slack card — contradictions, recurring topics, sprint-risk math, dependency checks — written back only on your say-so.
Value between meetings, not just after them. PR activity, stale tickets, and time-based signals keep the engine working on a quiet week — and follow-ups can be scheduled straight from what was discussed.
The longer Throughpoint runs alongside your team, the more it understands how your org actually operates — which dependencies always slip, which decisions get re-litigated, what continuity looks like across quarters.
Design partners shape what ships next. Join now and you help decide which producer comes online first.
Neither, really. Notes and tickets show up at the edges, but the bit you'll feel every day is the Slack card that reconciles what your team just decided with what's already on the sprint.
The reconciliation core: contradiction detection against past decisions, recurring-topic surfacing, sprint-risk math, and one-tap writes to Linear, Jira, or GitHub Issues. Between-meeting coordination and follow-up scheduling are rolling out to design partners now — we'll tell you exactly what's on when you join.
They give you a transcript. We give you a button. Notetakers tell you what was said; Throughpoint tells you what changed — priorities, ownership, dependencies, timelines, execution risk — and only writes anything after you approve.
Only if you don't already have one. If you do, we can replace it — Throughpoint reads your sprint and reconciles state, which a plain notetaker never did. Plenty of teams keep just one bot in the room.
No replay. Audio is processed for decision extraction and then dropped. What we keep is the structured trail — decisions, owners, dependencies — not the recording.
Then you dismiss the card. Nothing was written; nothing needs unwinding. The approval step is the whole point — it's where you catch the ones we get wrong.
We’re onboarding small engineering teams on Linear or Jira. 30-minute setup, and your next planning session ends with the tickets already updated.
We email from a human address. No drips, no “nurture campaigns.”
One short email when a slot opens. We never share your address.
